JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 4, 2010

A- de 2010

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Iván Palacio Palacio

✓Claimant Ezequiel Arenas Morales·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Corte Constitucional
  • Procedencia excepcional frente al cumplimiento de sus fallos
Acción De Tutela
  • Negar solicitud de cumplimiento de sentencia T-140/08
Cumplimiento Fallo De Tutela E Incidente De Desacato
  • Competencia del juez de primera instancia
4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de Cumplimiento.

El peticionario pretende que se adelanten los trámites necesarios para dar cumplimiento a la sentencia T-140/08.

En el presente caso no se configuran las excepciones previstas para que la Corporación sea competente para hacer efectiva la decisión adoptada en la sentencia, para exigir su cumplimiento ó para adelantar un eventual incidente de desacato, pues no se advierte presencia de algunas de las causales de evidencia de un manifiesto incumplimiento de la decisión o que las mismas hayan resultado insuficientes o ineficaces.

NEGADA

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. NEGAR la solicitud, promovida por el senor Ezequiel Arenas Morales contra el Tribunal Medico Laboral, (Ministerio de Defensa).
  2. Segundo. Por Secretaria General de esta Corporacion ORDENAR la remision de la copia del presente Auto y sus anexos al Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Buga-Valle, para que se adjunte al expediente de tutela de la sentencia T-140 de 2008.
  3. Cuarto. Contra la presente providencia no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.